Forum Rules:
- Be courteous and respectful.
- Ask questions and discuss topics of interest.
- Share your knowledge and experiences.
- Create connections and a sense of community.
I’m looking for feedback from anyone currently utilizing Veeva for electronic consent. Our current paper consent template includes a line where study teams check off “Not Applicable” when an interpreter/witness was not needed during the consent process. Can you speak to the process of your workflow as to how and who is triggering and attesting to whether the interpreter/witness was needed and at which step during the signing of the electronic consent this is being documented directly on the form? Any other tips for Veeva eConsent would be greatly appreciated as well!
Thanks!