<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Research Compliance Network Forum - Recent Topics				            </title>
            <link>https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/</link>
            <description>Research Compliance Network Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:26:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>FDA INDSR Review Policy</title>
                        <link>https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/fda-indsr-review-policy/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 20:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hi all, I&#039;m looking to learn more about how your institutions are addressing new contents of the December 2025 FDA &quot;Investigator Responsibilities — Safety Reporting for Investigational Drugs...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, I'm looking to learn more about how your institutions are addressing new contents of the December 2025 FDA "Investigator Responsibilities — Safety Reporting for Investigational Drugs and Devices". There is a new statement that was not previously included in the 2012 version: "The investigator should review all IND safety reports received from sponsors as a part of the investigator’s responsibility to protect the rights, safety, and welfare of trial participants (see § 312.60)."</p>
<p>If your institution allows the investigator of an externally sponsored study to delegate review of INDSRs to another qualified member of the study team, and the PI only personally reviews those that meet the definition for UAP, how are you interpreting this new statement?</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>alyssapingitore</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/fda-indsr-review-policy/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Accessing other ICFs for Research</title>
                        <link>https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/accessing-other-icfs-for-research/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 22:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[We have a graduate student that would like to use approved informed consent forms (not signed by participants, only the consent form) to answer a research question and has requested access t...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a graduate student that would like to use approved informed consent forms (not signed by participants, only the consent form) to answer a research question and has requested access to these from the IRB. The consents would be from any sponsor (industry, investigator, federal etc...) Can you tell me if you have ever had such a request and how you managed the access to the ICFs?</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Sbrowning</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/accessing-other-icfs-for-research/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Audit Scoring</title>
                        <link>https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/monitoring/audit-scoring/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 20:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Does anyone use a scoring system for audits? If so, what kind of scoring system do you use?]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone use a scoring system for audits? If so, what kind of scoring system do you use?</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>CZwieg</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/monitoring/audit-scoring/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Comparison of Research Regulations</title>
                        <link>https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/comparison-of-research-regulations/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 19:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello,
I have been tasked with creating a document that compares FDA, ICH-GCP, and HHS research regulations.  Is there anyone in the forum that has already creating such a document?  If so,...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I have been tasked with creating a document that compares FDA, ICH-GCP, and HHS research regulations.  Is there anyone in the forum that has already creating such a document?  If so, would you be willing to share it with me?</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
<p>Lori Oosterman</p>
<p>Corewell Health Research Compliance</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>oostls</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/comparison-of-research-regulations/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Novelution, Kuali, or InfoEd users?</title>
                        <link>https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/novelution-kuali-or-infoed-users/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello,
Are there any institutions using Novelution, Kuali, or InfoEd for their electronic IRB platform?  The University of Michigan is currently looking at a new vendor for our IRB platform...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Are there any institutions using Novelution, Kuali, or InfoEd for their electronic IRB platform?  The University of Michigan is currently looking at a new vendor for our IRB platform and wanted to hear from peer institutions who are using these platforms.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>sasamoke</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/novelution-kuali-or-infoed-users/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Wearables, phone apps, algorithms</title>
                        <link>https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/wearables-phone-apps-algorithms/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 14:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Our IRB has seen an increase in investigator-initiated studies that are utilizing wearables, phone apps, algorithms, etc where data may be going out of the research/academic institution (e.g...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Our IRB has seen an increase in investigator-initiated studies that are utilizing wearables, phone apps, algorithms, etc where data may be going out of the research/academic institution (e.g. Apple watch, or third-party phone app). Most studies are minimal risk, with data privacy considerations being the primary risk. We are benchmarking how institutional IRBs are reviewing similar studies and navigating any <u>institutional</u> requirements that may fall outside of the IRB purview (e.g. IT security or privacy/security office). We are specifically interested in how institutions navigate data privacy considerations for research studies where there will not be a contract in place with outside company (e.g. Apple, FitBit). </span></p>
<p><span>-What information is required for IRB review?</span></p>
<p><span>-How does the IRB handle the data privacy risks? e.g. disclosing in the consent form or utilizing required template language? Template language?</span></p>
<p><span>-Does the <u>institution</u> have specific requirements for reviews outside of IRB related to data privacy and security? If so, does that review occur in parallel with IRB? Before IRB review?</span></p>
<p><span>-Does the institution make the decision on whether the study can be conducted based on the data privacy risks?</span></p>
<p><span data-teams="true">Any policies or procedural information you can share would be greatly appreciated!</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thank you, </p>
<p>Lisa Schaffer</p>
<p>lisa.schaffer@louisville.edu</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>LDSchaffer</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/wearables-phone-apps-algorithms/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Corrective Action Plans</title>
                        <link>https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/corrective-action-plans/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2025 15:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I am looking at revising our corrective action plan template and helping the study team identify the root cause for their error.  Does anyone have a corrective action plan template or guidan...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking at revising our corrective action plan template and helping the study team identify the root cause for their error.  Does anyone have a corrective action plan template or guidance that they love and would be willing to share?  </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>LDSchaffer</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/corrective-action-plans/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>AVOCA</title>
                        <link>https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/avoca/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 14:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Are any of your facilities a member of AVOCA? Any opinions of the service? Thank you.]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are any of your facilities a member of AVOCA? Any opinions of the service? Thank you.</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>cindyfontenelle</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/other/avoca/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Veeva eConsent - Minors</title>
                        <link>https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/econsent/veeva-econsent-minors/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 17:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Do you currently use Veeva eConsent to obtain electronic assent/parental permission/HIPAA authorizations from minors?]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span data-teams="true">Do you currently use Veeva eConsent to obtain electronic assent/parental permission/HIPAA authorizations from minors?</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>jbkauwell</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/econsent/veeva-econsent-minors/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Fee for Audit Service for Relying Institutions</title>
                        <link>https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/monitoring/fee-for-audit-service-for-relying-institutions/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Does anyone offer monitoring/auditing for a fee for relying institutions? What has been your experience and how have you determined the fee structure? Thank you!]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone offer monitoring/auditing for a fee for relying institutions? What has been your experience and how have you determined the fee structure? Thank you!</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Courtney Karmelita</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://researchcompliancenetwork.org/community/monitoring/fee-for-audit-service-for-relying-institutions/</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		